The Lab / Alien Math

Alien Math · follow-up to PG-019

The wormhole bill

A doorway through space one metre wide costs about minus 1.1 Jupiters of energy. The minus sign is the whole problem: energy anyone can collect is positive, and no amount of it converts.

The bill for a one metre throatA doorway one metre across on the left. On the right, a planet the size of Jupiter drawn as a hollow dashed outline, because the energy needed is negative: about minus 1.1 Jupiter masses. throat, 1 m costs −1.1 Jupiters of energy that weighs less than nothing
The dashed planet is a debt. A star, a Dyson swarm or a galaxy can only pay in the other currency.

The bill

The wall, pinned

The record for PG-019 names a materials wall: the lens plate n(ρ) = 1 + (a/2ρ)² needs n → ∞ at the centre and n = 2 at the throat, and printed pillars stop at n = 1.34, so the plate only lenses for b ≥ 1.15a. The energy wall is the same Ellis metric built in real gravity, which that record never priced. Here it is priced; the numeric integral matches the closed form to 15 digits.

The bill (for throat radius a = 1 m)ValueScales as
Ellis throat, total negative energy (−πc⁴a/2G)−1.9×1044 J = −1.1 Jupiter masseslinear in a
Visser thin-shell (flat cut-and-paste), negative mass−1.4 Jupiter masseslinear in a
Ford–Roman quantum inequalitynegative energy must sit in a band "many orders of magnitude smaller than the throat"tighter for bigger throats
Casimir energy density at 10 nm gap−4.3×104 J/m³1/d⁴
Casimir volume needed at 10 nm4.4×1039 m³ ≈ 3 trillion Suns
Positive rest energy of the plates (graphene) vs Casimir negative energy1.6×1014 : 1, net positive
Sun's full output to collect 1.9×1044 J (positive)16 billion years

The last two rows carry the argument. Energy you can harvest is positive; the plates that make Casimir negative energy outweigh it by 14 orders of magnitude. The budget is a sign constraint (the null energy condition), so Kardashev scale alone does not buy it.

Seven ways round

Routes to the budget, ranked

The routes that dodge the sign exist on paper. Each one trades the sign problem for a new one: unknown physics, a black hole of ten thousand Suns, or no faster-than-light at all.

Ranked by the chance the route ever yields a throat something can go through. "Gap" is an order-of-magnitude call. Figures marked ~ are from memory and were not re-read for this page.

#RouteWhat would need to be trueGap todayKnown no-goOdds call
1Find one, don't build one (primordial / relic wormholes)Early-universe topology left throats around; we spot them by their lensingUnknown existence; microlensing searches set upper limits only (~)None in principle; needs exotic matter to have stayed putLow, but the only route with zero new tech
2Maldacena–Milekhin "humanly traversable"Randall–Sundrum extra dimension + a dark U(1) + two extremal magnetic black holes joined; fermion Casimir energy pays the signNeeds that dark sector (nobody has seen one) and black holes with r_e > 1.5×107 m, about 104 SunsOutside clocks: tens of thousands of years, so no shortcutBest on-paper physics; a 1 s ride for the traveller
3Gao–Jafferis–Wall coupled throats (teleportation)Couple two entangled black holes (or two qubit registers) so a signal crossesWorks now as a quantum circuit; carries qubits; people stay homeNever beats the classical channel it rides onCertain for information, zero for travel
4Modified gravity (Gauss–Bonnet, f(R), braneworld)Extra curvature terms supply the NEC violation, ordinary matter stays positiveNo sign of those terms at the needed strength; GW170817 fixed c_gw = c to ~10-15Kills many scalar–tensor versionsLow
5Dirac-fermion + Maxwell wormholes (Blázquez-Salcedo, Knoll, Radu 2021)Charged fermions alone hold the throat openNeeds charge-to-mass far beyond any known particle; throats microscopic (~)Smoothness at the throat disputed (Bolokhov et al. 2021, ~)Low
6Engineered negative energy (Casimir, squeezed light) on a Visser thin shellMake, hold and place −1.4 Jupiter masses per metre in a Planck-thin bandNet sign wrong by ~1014; band thickness set by Ford–RomanQuantum inequalities; plate rest massEffectively nil
7Kardashev brute force (Dyson swarm, galactic output)Positive energy can be turned into negative energyEnergy available (16 Gyr of Sun, 55 days of a galaxy); conversion impossibleNEC; averaged NEC theorem (Graham–Olum)Nil on its own; multiplies any route that solves the sign

Pinch-zoom near home

Warp shells, priced

To pinch space around a ship locally, the cheapest solution anyone has published that obeys every energy condition is a shell of 2.4 Jupiter masses, 10–20 m across, that goes slower than light and cannot accelerate itself. Its average density is 1.5×1023 kg/m³, about 650,000× nuclear density, and its inner wall sits at 1.5× its own Schwarzschild radius (6.7 m). Faster than light still needs negative energy in every version checked.

MetricSpeedEnergy neededCatch
Alcubierre 1994Any, including > cNegative; Pfenning–Ford wall ≤ ~100 v Planck lengths, total far above the visible universe's mass (~1010×, as usually quoted)Crew can't signal the bubble's front; Hawking-like blueshift pile-up at the front wall (Finazzi–Liberati–Barceló 2009)
Van Den Broeck 1999> cNegative, cut to a few Suns (~)Same sign problem, Planck-scale geometry
Natário 2002> cNegative, zero volume expansionShows the "squeeze ahead, stretch behind" picture is optional; the sign isn't
Lentz 2021 / Fell–Heisenberg 2021> c claimedPositive for Eulerian observersSantiago, Schuster & Visser: generic warp drives violate the NEC for some observer (~)
Bobrick & Martire 2021< c (positive), > c (negative)Positive subluminal; negative cut 100× by shapingEvery warp drive is a shell that needs propulsion
Fuchs et al. 2024< c, constantPositive: 4.49×1027 kg, R1 = 10 m, R2 = 20 m, shift β = 0.02No speed-up mechanism; a near-black-hole shell
Plain gravity (time pinch)n/aAny massReal today: GPS clocks gain 38 μs/day; it zooms time, not distance
Acoustic analog (PG-019 family)> "c" for soundA pumpOnly sound sees the warp; this is what the lab can build

In short: for slower-than-light pinch-zoom, Jupiter-class mass compressed to near-black-hole density plus a separate thruster. For faster than light, the same sign wall as the wormhole.

Proving Ground habit

Steelman, hole, attack

The strongest route is the one that needs no builder: if throats exist, they show up as Ellis lenses, and our plate already computes that lens exactly.

RouteSteelmanHoleAttack within reach
Find oneNature makes what we can't; the Ellis lens has a unique light-curve shape (demagnification dip)Any relic throat needs its own exotic support to survive 13.8 GyrFit Ellis-lens curves to public microlensing data; reuse wormhole_lens.py's exact deflection
Maldacena–MilekhinNo exotic classical matter; Standard-Model-style fermions in a magnetic field give a 2D Casimir energy −c₂/(8ℓ) that pays the signRests on a dark sector nobody has seen; 104-Sun magnetic black holes; outside clocks run 104 yearsCompute the 2D Casimir energy on a ring and check the sign and the 1/ℓ law numerically
Gao–Jafferis–WallShown inside AdS/CFT; already run as circuits (Jafferis et al. 2022)The 2022 "wormhole" signal was disputed (Kobrin et al. 2023, ~); it is teleportation with geometry on topExtend PG-021 on ibm_fez: a size-winding teleportation circuit with a pre-registered fidelity
Modified gravityThe NEC is a statement about matter; change the geometry side and matter can stay ordinaryTheories that do this tend to be ghosts or already ruled out by gravitational-wave speedLiterature-only for now; flag which survive GW170817
Dirac wormholesOrdinary-looking spin-½ fields, no phantom fieldCharge-to-mass needed is unphysical; throat smoothness disputedReproduce their ODE system; check the throat matching condition we'd need
Casimir / squeezed vacuumNegative energy density has been measuredQuantum inequalities: the more negative, the shorter and thinner; plates outweigh it 1014:1A Ford–Roman bound calculator: for a target throat, print the allowed band and duration
KardashevEnergy is no limit: a galaxy makes 1.9×1044 J in 55 daysYou cannot turn positive energy into negative energyNone: this is a multiplier

On the bench

Runs within reach

Sound inside a moving bubble, slower and faster than soundTwo bubbles moving right. In the slow one, wave crests ahead stay evenly spaced and leave through the front. In the fast one, the crests bunch tighter and tighter against the front wall and never get out. bubble at 0.5 × soundbubble at 2 × sound crests walk outcrests pile on the front wall
Drawn from the ray trace: below the speed of sound the forward ray stretches a little and leaves. Above it, the ray freezes on the front wall and its pitch climbs without limit.

A pilot result first. Its predictions were never locked, so it seeds a card and grades nothing. The lab ray-traced sound through an acoustic Alcubierre bubble, which is just a moving-fluid bubble, since the Alcubierre metric with c = 1 is exactly Unruh's acoustic metric. Below the speed of sound the forward ray's wavenumber grows only e0.7 to e2.3 over the run. Above it the ray freezes at a horizon on the front wall and blueshifts without limit, e100 to e240, at a rate within 5% of the wall's surface gravity. That is the Finazzi–Liberati–Barceló instability, reproduced in a bucket of moving water.

Bubble speed (× sound)Horizon?ln(blueshift) over t = 20Fitted ratePredicted κ
0.5No0.7n/an/a
0.9No2.3n/an/a
1.5Yes, front wall1025.15.3
2.0Yes1527.68.0
5.0Yes24312.112.8

Proposed card PG-028 "Pinch-zoom budget", predictions written before any run:

  1. Labyrinth plate reaches the throat (the real wall in the record). Coiled-channel unit cells give n = 2 at ρ = a/2. Prediction: a full-wave sim of a coiled-cell plate shows the capture shadow of radius a within 10%, below the cell's homogenisation limit. Fails if the shadow smears beyond 20%.
  2. Acoustic warp bubble, full wave equation. Prediction: front-wall blueshift rate matches κ within 5% for speeds 1.5–5; adding Bogoliubov dispersion caps the pile-up at k ≈ 1/ξ. Fails if the cap is absent or the rate is off by more than 10%.
  3. Ellis-lens finder. Injection and recovery on synthetic microlensing curves. Prediction: Ellis versus point-mass lens told apart at Δχ² > 25 for impact u₀ < 1 at 1% photometry. Then point it at public survey light curves.
  4. Ford–Roman calculator. Prediction: for a 1 m throat the allowed negative-energy band comes out under 10-20 m. Fails if it comes out macroscopic.
  5. Maldacena–Milekhin ring check. Prediction: free fermions on a ring give Casimir energy −c/(12·circumference)-type scaling (their −c₂/8ℓ), sign negative, 1/ℓ within 1%.
  6. Printed pillar plate (already built, ungraded): exit angles follow 2K(a/b) − π for b ≥ 1.15a.

Items 1 and 2 are the ones that move the sim forward; 3 is the only one that could ever find a real throat.

Sources

Sources

Opened for this page: Fuchs et al. 2024, constant-velocity physical warp drive · Maldacena & Milekhin, humanly traversable wormholes · Pfenning & Ford, the unphysical nature of warp drive · Ford & Roman 1996, QFT constrains traversable wormholes · Bobrick & Martire 2021, introducing physical warp drives.

From memory, with no re-read (the ~ marks above): Alcubierre 1994; Van Den Broeck 1999; Natário 2002; Lentz 2021; Fell & Heisenberg 2021; Santiago, Schuster & Visser 2022; Blázquez-Salcedo, Knoll & Radu 2021 and Bolokhov et al. 2021; Gao, Jafferis & Wall 2017; Jafferis et al. 2022 and Kobrin et al. 2023; Graham & Olum 2007; Finazzi, Liberati & Barceló 2009; Ellis-lens microlensing limits.

The lab's own numbers come from two short scripts, one for the bill and one for the ray trace.

This follows the wormhole lens in Every loophole sends a bill. The older interactive room is the wormhole room, and the card it grew from sits on the Proving Ground board.