Claims from TV and YouTube, taken seriously enough to measure. Each episode gets a real simulator, a check written down before the run that is allowed to fail, and a one-line verdict.
Every verdict is one of three kinds. There is no fourth. A claim that points at nothing measurable gets named, not judged.
The claim holds
The effect is there, and for the reason given.
Real effect, different reason
Something real is going on, but the explanation attached to it is wrong.
Nothing there
The effect does not show up once the instrument can be trusted.
Written down first. The prediction and the check that could fail are committed before the code that produces the numbers.
Every instrument is seen red once. Each check is broken on purpose and watched failing, so a pass means something.
Nothing is called new until someone has searched the existing literature. Most answers are textbook, and saying so is a result.
One episode at a time. Each gets a full session, not a slice of one.
How an episode moves:queued→preregistered→run→verdict→published
Fair to the people on screen. The shows and hosts cited here are real. We describe their claims neutrally, with the episode’s title, date and a link, and without their branding or transcript text. Verdicts are about claims, never about people. When a claim points at something real, the verdict says so.
Verdict in
Tested
3 episodes have been run against a preregistered gate and judged.
Real effect, different reason A spiral does twist the waves that escape it, by ordinary reflection. In equilibrium the twist is zero, and the old +19.05 was an integrator artifact. The mechanism is textbook prior art.
The question. The episode cites the 2023 CUNY time-reflection experiment. What does it actually show?
Real effect, different reason Time reflection is real and matches the textbook formulas to within 0.25 %: a medium switched uniformly in time reverses a signal's order and shifts its frequency, with the switch supplying the energy. Nothing reaches a time before its cause, so it is not bending time or time travel.
The question. Did Kozyrev detect stars at their calculated present and future positions?
Nothing there The published star detections agree with the parallaxes of their day, including ones since revised by 2-5 sigma, and miss the modern positions by 13-27 arcsec. The agreement is with the calculation, not with the sky.
12 episodes are planned. Nothing in this section is a result, and each gate is a draft until its preregistration is committed. The coming-soon page has every one in full.
Next up · coming soon · not yet tested
HI-2 · The sound windmill
2-D wave simulatorest. 2 h
The question. Can a Kozyrev mirror be a motor as a rotor?
The claim, as presented. A question put to the lab: if a Kozyrev mirror twists waves, can it turn itself when it is free to rotate?
Draft gate, not yet preregistered. Case (c), diffuse equal-temperature noise, must come out zero within error, or the model is broken. Reaction torque is computed as −(angular-momentum flux), τ = ℓP/ω.
HI-3 · The Crookes radiometerComing soon · not yet tested Why does it spin the 'wrong' way for light pressure? the full entry →
HI-4 · The spiral antennaComing soon · not yet tested Is a log spiral really scale-free? the full entry →
HI-5 · The cochleaComing soon · not yet tested Does the coil help us hear bass? the full entry →
HI-6 · The seashellComing soon · not yet tested Does a shell 'amplify' the sea? the full entry →
HI-7 · Drone-ID by spinning noiseComing soon · not yet tested Can a mic ring read a rotor's blade count and spin direction? the full entry →
HI-8 · The twist sorterComing soon · not yet tested Can twisted sound separate left- from right-handed objects? the full entry →
HI-9 · Coiled brassComing soon · not yet tested Does coiling a tuba change its sound? the full entry →
HI-10 · Pyramid power, orgone boxes, scalar pendants…Coming soon · not yet tested Each 'energy device' claim, one at a time. the full entry →
HI-12 · Does the mirror 'focus' anything?Coming soon · not yet tested The episode's actual claim: a spiral concentrates an ambient energy. the full entry →
HI-13 · Aluminium as a shieldComing soon · not yet tested Does an aluminium tube shield out geomagnetic 'interference'? the full entry →
HI-14 · Honest statisticsComing soon · not yet tested Do '95 % telepathy across 5,000 people' and '61 % vs 8 % earthquake prediction' beat chance? the full entry →
Also on the coming-soon page: 9 ideas on the shelf, and 4 claims from the shows that no instrument can reach.
The episode registry, the preregistrations and the results live in the lab’s notebook, which is not public yet. This page is rendered from a copy of the registry, so it can only show a result the notebook already holds. Back to the lab →